Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[installer] remove socket env assertion (backport of #27223) #27334

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 7.55.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

paullegranddc
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Additional Notes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Describe how to test/QA your changes

@paullegranddc paullegranddc requested a review from a team as a code owner July 4, 2024 14:31
@paullegranddc paullegranddc added team/fleet-automation changelog/no-changelog qa/done Skip QA week as QA was done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Jul 4, 2024
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv create-vm --pipeline-id=38383708 --os-family=ubuntu

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 44.93%. Comparing base (51a7526) to head (f07a7a9).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           7.55.x   #27334      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   44.93%   44.93%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        2354     2354              
  Lines      272912   272912              
==========================================
- Hits       122641   122627      -14     
- Misses     140590   140605      +15     
+ Partials     9681     9680       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
amzn_aarch64 45.77% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
centos_x86_64 45.68% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
ubuntu_aarch64 45.78% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
ubuntu_x86_64 45.77% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
windows_amd64 50.76% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: fd6efc36-76ae-4eec-a441-857f3453ce75

Baseline: 51a7526
Comparison: f07a7a9

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI links
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.21 [-2.71, +3.13]
pycheck_1000_100byte_tags % cpu utilization +0.20 [-4.71, +5.10]
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.05 [-0.00, +0.10]
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput +0.02 [-0.36, +0.39]
trace_agent_json ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.01, +0.02]
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.20, +0.20]
trace_agent_msgpack ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.00]
basic_py_check % cpu utilization -0.16 [-2.87, +2.55]
file_tree memory utilization -0.28 [-0.38, -0.17]
idle memory utilization -0.76 [-0.80, -0.71]
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -1.97 [-23.02, +19.09]

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog qa/done Skip QA week as QA was done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/fleet-automation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants